I’ll be drying the silver out and weighing it sometime in the next couple days. Closest guess when I do gets bragging rights! (And absolutely nothing else)

The scale was zeroed with the beaker empty, and it contains only water and silver (and a trace amount of copper nitrate). If you have a strategy behind your guess, please do share it!

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    830g.

    People already did the work for me , so I’m playing The Price Is Right is my methodology.

  • jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago
    Density of silver: 10.49g/mL
    Density of water: 1g/mL
    
    Total mass: 1464g
    Total volume: 700mL
    
    x = volume of silver, mL
    y = volume of water, mL
    
    10.49x + 1y = 1464
    x+y = 700
    
    9.49x=764
    x=80.5058mL of silver
    
    10.49x = 
    10.49 × 80.5058 =
    
    844.51g of silver
    

    Probably an over estimate [of just the silver] due to the copper so probably more like 835-840g. [If just evaporating, the mass would be higher due to the lower density of the impurities like copper sulfate, so more around 845-850g. E.g. 5mL of copper sulfate would be 830g of silver and 18g copper sulfate = 848g]

    • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Damn, you were faster than I was, I was just calculating the same thing. All I have left is to assume that they won’t be able to fully dry the silver and guess a bit higher… 850g.

      • LostXOR@fedia.ioOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Unfortunately for you, I’ve got a hot plate and it gets pretty darn hot.

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    250ml solution (mostly water on top) = 250g

    700g (if 700ml water) - 250g = 450ml silver slurry

    450ml silver powder weight (dry) = 1800g

    1464g (total) - 250g (excess water) = 1214g

    450ml slurry = 1214g slurry

    1800g (dry silver) - 1214g (silver slurry) = 516g (516ml water in slurry)

    1464g (total) - 516g (water) = 948g silver powder.

    I always miss something obviously stupid when doing math in public. However, it sounds suspiciously close to a 1kg starting weight of silver though.

    • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      1800g (dry silver) - 1214g (silver slurry) = 516g (516ml water in slurry)

      What? Why? I’m kind of sure that this is wrong (subtracting (water + silver) from silver can’t get you water, you could get (silver - water) at best) but I’m interested in the reasoning here because it short circuit my brain.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        I’ll walk through it again, as you are probably right, and I can find the mistake.

        1800g is the estimate weight of 450g silver powder.

        The total weight is 1464g.

        There is 250ml (g) of water at the top of the container, which we subtract from the total weight, leaving 1214g of a silver/water slurry.

        1800g should be the weight

        1214g is the weight.

        (Here is the mistake) The weight difference is 516g, which is the weight of the missing silver in the slurry, not the weight of the water in the slurry.

        So, I would need to convert 516g to an approximate volume of silver powder. Since we have volume, we can now compute the weight of the water in the slurry.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I always miss something

      Yes, in the very last line, it made no sense anymore (and I bet you felt it in your gut).

      It should not be:

      1464g (total) - 516g (water) = 948g silver powder.

      but rather:

      1214g (silver slurry) - 516g (water in slurry) = 698g silver powder.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Damnit. I edited with that correction, but deleted the edit, cause who the fuck knows why. Was kind of in a rush at the time, and didn’t think I would have been silly enough to miss the 250g.

        Good cach and yeah, I felt it.

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    1026g. Based on the amount of visible water volume, and a guess of more above that subtracted from the total weight.

  • CelloMike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    1102g - took a stab at the density of micron-sized silver powder, the volume, then arbitrarily knocked off 30% for the saturation in water 🤷

  • remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    How much? Weight or volume?

    I assume you mean weight… Give me a sec and I’ll take a guess.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Nah, it was kind of a dumb question actually. The volume isn’t going to change much unless you melt it down. Thanks though!