Room temp superconductors, would be amazing for maglev trains and the electric grid

Basically a material that doesn’t have electrical resistance and has some funky magnetic properties but works at normal temperatures

Almost anything is allowed if you don’t get caught /j

but I’m not wrong…

low-key maybe killing tons of people isn’t a nice idea

I’d prefer solar to nuclear and oil, but I’d also take nuclear over oil any day

For things that require a definite, correct answer, an LLM just isn’t the best tool for it. However if the task is something with many correct answers, or no correct answer, like for instance writing computer code (if its rigorously checked against its actually not that bad) or for analyzing vast amounts of text quickly, then you could make the argument that its the right tool for the job.

I think somehow incentivizing companies to use solar power to power their data centers would be a step in the right direction

I’m all for open source

but you know I was totally with you until you said kill all the billionaires

You shouldn’t trust anything the LLM tells you though, because it’s a guessing machine

You trust tons of other uncertain probability-based systems though. Like the weather forecast, we all trust that, even though it ‘guesses’ the future weather with some other math

Nobody talks how it highlights the success of capitalism either.

it definitely does both

OpenAI, for example, needs to be regulated with the same intensity as a much smaller company

not too long ago they went to Congress to get them to regulate the ai industry a lot more and wanted the govt to require licences to train large models. Large companies can benefit from regulations when they aren’t easy for smaller competitors to follow.

And OpenAI should have no say in how they are regulated.

For sure, otherwise regulation could be made too restrictive, lowing competition

Before any model is released to the public, I want clear evidence that the LLM will tell me if it doesn’t know something, and will never hallucinate or make something up.

I think thats technically really difficult, but maybe if the output of the model was checked against preexisting sources that could happen, like what Google uses for Gemini

Every step of any deductive process needs to be citable and traceable.

I’m pretty sure this is completely impossible

Nuclear thermal rockets, at least twice as efficient as the best chemical ones, and are absolutely going to be used for space travel to the moon and Mars in the future. NASA was working on them in the 60s and early 70s but when the space race started to cool down they stopped. There’s been more money put into that stuff recently though

i=sqrt(-1) is nice, but im hoping someone finds a use for the number x where |x| = -1 or some nonsense like that because it looks fun to mess with

deleted by creator

satoshis private key is…and from there slowly

how though

by far the best here