E: /stoned

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Well yes, but only by a little. It was using ancient measuring techniques which were highly error-prone. Like running from one place to the next and counting the length manually. Shit like that. Still impressively close to the real size!

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        But if the people deciding what the meter was at first were allowed to make errors, why werent the people deciding what the new meter was?

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Like what the other person said, you don’t know the extent of your error until you have a more accurate measuring technique.

          And you don’t just redefine an already-established unit. 😅 Rather, all the things that depend on the meter will be fucked up instead.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Yeah but no. An established unit didn’t change. Otherwise all the old literature will depend on history rather than just still be true and valid.

        • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          But if the people deciding what the meter was at first were allowed to make errors

          It’s not that they were allowed to make errors, it’s more like they made errors and didn’t know any better.

          why werent the people deciding what the new meter was?

          They may very well have made a mistake, and we just haven’t noticed yet.