• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Agreed. I am in the process of creating a lemmy instance (mostly for testing), with the core tenets being free speech and freedom of information. I just need to find a way of rewording it so that people don’t think it means endorsement of assholery.

      I think invite-only and “Don’t make me ban you!” as the only rule could work.

      • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        “Don’t make me ban you!” Isn’t a rule.

        A rule would be “don’t say anything I dislike”

        • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Your comments in this thread sound a lot like you not wanting us to say anything you dislike. I respect your opinions and I would fight for you being allowed to share them. I just think they’re wrong and disingenuous.

          • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 days ago

            I’m just rephrasing it to frame it as a command. That’s basically what a rule is. A command. A rule has imperativeness.

    • rainrain@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      If you intend to wax pedantic then at least give us your definition. This secondhand linked pedantry crosses the line.